Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Building: VMP 8, Floor: Ground, Room: VMP8-08
Thursday 09:00 - 10:40 CEST (23/08/2018)
Both the all-subjected principle (ASP) and the all-affected principle (AAP) claim to provide attractive alternatives to standard accounts of democratic enfranchisement, which restrict access to political participation rights to citizens only; yet both ASP and AAP are subject to pervasive controversy. What are the comparative advantages of each principle? Which principle, if any, can plausibly respond to recent critiques (over-inclusiveness, over-demandingness, indeterminacy)? How can ASP and AAP be implemented in real democratic institutions in a feasible way?
| Title | Details |
|---|---|
| Democracy and the Boundary Problems of Political Legitimacy | View Paper Details |
| Democratic Innovations and the Boundary Problem: The Boundary Assembly | View Paper Details |
| In Defense of the All-Affected Principle: A Realist Reply to Four Objections | View Paper Details |
| Affected Interests and Weighted Votes | View Paper Details |