Install the app
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Menu
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Building: VMP 8, Floor: Ground, Room: VMP8-08
Thursday 09:00 - 10:40 CEST (23/08/2018)
Both the all-subjected principle (ASP) and the all-affected principle (AAP) claim to provide attractive alternatives to standard accounts of democratic enfranchisement, which restrict access to political participation rights to citizens only; yet both ASP and AAP are subject to pervasive controversy. What are the comparative advantages of each principle? Which principle, if any, can plausibly respond to recent critiques (over-inclusiveness, over-demandingness, indeterminacy)? How can ASP and AAP be implemented in real democratic institutions in a feasible way?
| Title | Details |
|---|---|
| Democracy and the Boundary Problems of Political Legitimacy | View Paper Details |
| Democratic Innovations and the Boundary Problem: The Boundary Assembly | View Paper Details |
| In Defense of the All-Affected Principle: A Realist Reply to Four Objections | View Paper Details |
| Affected Interests and Weighted Votes | View Paper Details |