Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Building: VMP 9, Floor: 2, Room: 27
Thursday 11:00 - 12:40 CEST (23/08/2018)
Recently political backlash against constitutional courts seems to have become a general phenomenon in several Central European countries. This backlash presupposes that courts have assumed enough power to generate a reaction amongst dominant political actors—but the degree to which this power and authority has actually constrained these dominant actors has not yet been systematically examined. The JUDICON project has elaborated a systematic method to measure the strength of judicial decisions. This Panel will use the JUDICON dataset to answer the general question: to what extent have courts constrained the legislature's room for manoeuvre in politically salient issues? Four country studies will elucidate whether courts have indeed stalled highly important policy processes, or whether this is a misleading narrative propagated by legislative majorities.
Title | Details |
---|---|
Politically Salient Issues Before the Hungarian Constitutional Court. An Empirical Analysis 1990-2015 | View Paper Details |
Powerful Court Decisions. The Case of the German Constitutional Court | View Paper Details |
Pragmatic Constitutional Court in Russia’s Dual State | View Paper Details |
Attitudinal Model Applied to the Hungarian Constitutional Court. A Refined Analysis of Judicial Behavior from 1990 to 2015 | View Paper Details |
Safeguarding the Democracy from Inside: The Story of the Constitutional Court and the Parliament in Czechia | View Paper Details |