ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Judicial Politics: New Data and Methods

Comparative Politics
Courts
Jurisprudence
Methods
Qualitative
Judicialisation
Big Data
P196
Benjamin G. Engst
Norwegian University of Science & Technology, Trondheim
Philipp Schroeder
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München – LMU
Law and Courts

Wednesday 13:15 - 15:00 BST (26/08/2020)

Abstract

Comparative research on judicial behaviour, courts’ inner-workings and interactions with other political actors has been suffering from a lack of systematic large-scale data comparable to that of the US Supreme Court. This panel invites scholars to address methodological challenges in the field and present novel tools that allow for generating insights into the decision-making of domestic and international courts. In particular, we welcome research that (1) draws on efforts to establish systematic databases on courts beyond the USA or (2) explores judicial behaviour through novel methodologies.

Title Details
What Factors Influence Judicial Decisions on Regulatory Matters in Brazil? View Paper Details
Agenda Control and Coalition Bargaining in the European Court of Human Rights View Paper Details
Strategic Concurrence: Causal Evidence from the Brazilian Supreme Court View Paper Details
Competence Expansion and Legitimization in the European Court of Justice View Paper Details
Do Constitutional Courts Write Their Opinions Differently Under Public Scrutiny? Applying NLP Methods to Uncover Argument Structure in Judicial Texts View Paper Details