This paper explores the 'selection bias' in the media reporting of the policy decisions presented in the Annual Budget in the UK. It aims to identify which variables explain the difference in prominence given by the media coverage to a wide range of fiscal policy decisions. Using automated content analysis, the study analyses the press
coverage of six 'crisis' Budgets, from 2008 to 2012 (with two in 2010). It then uses media, policy and government communication variables in a multi-level model to explain the variation.
This study will contribute to the literature on agendas and public policy, providing a much needed media angle, and to the literature on news production and determinants of newsworthiness with domestic policy-rather than international and/or
event-focus. In addition, it will provide an examination of the budget coverage over time.
