ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Implementing Truth Commission Recommendations: Typologies and Hypotheses

Conflict Resolution
Democratisation
Human Rights
Latin America
Analytic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis
Elin Skaar
Chr. Michelsen Institute
Elin Skaar
Chr. Michelsen Institute

Abstract

Truth commissions have become an indispensable part of the transitional justice tool-kit in recent years. The anticipated impact of such commissions is usually related to two things: the issuing of a report and the implementation of the recommendations made in the report. The recommendations of truth commissions may have bearings on how societies heal and develop after violent conflict – intersecting and overlapping with good governance and development concerns. Yet, we know very little about how, why, and which recommendations are in fact implemented – and when they are, with what effect. This paper takes stock of what we know and what we do not know. It proposes a typology for classifying truth commission recommendations we well as a (tentative) methodology for how to collect and analyse data on this under-researched phenomenon. The research project, of which this paper forms a part, will focus on Latin American truth commissions, but the analytical framework for analysing the implementation of truth commission recommendations should be applicable to commissions in other parts of the world.