ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Tyrannies of Distributed Leadership in Co-Production: Power, Process, Paralysis, Permission and Politeness

Democracy
Governance
Local Government
Political Activism
Empirical
Liz Richardson
University of Manchester
Liz Richardson
University of Manchester
Catherine Durose
University of Birmingham

Abstract

Co-production in governance, and distributed leadership, share a symbiotic association and normative appeal. This paper offers a contribution to theory and practice by presenting a challenge to the accounts that currently dominate which neglect key aspects of the challenges of leadership in coproduction. The term ‘tyranny’ has been used to highlight particular orthodoxies around citizen participation which limit the space, scale and scope for more profound critical perspectives. Utilising a critical case study of co-production, the development of a unique Action Research Collective (ARC), the paper identifies five tyrannies of distributed leadership in co-production: power, process, paralysis, permission and politeness. Acknowledging that whilst leadership may be distributed, power often is not, the paper offers an often absent critical and political perspective on both co-production and distributed leadership.