ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Party Positions, Electoral Systems, and Income Inequality

Elections
Political Economy
Political Parties
Sven Kosanke
University Greifswald
Sven Kosanke
University Greifswald
Philipp Harfst
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Nils Düpont
Universität Bremen

Abstract

Both income inequality and electoral systems impact political parties’ positioning on the left-right dimension. Meltzer and Richard (1981) show that an increase in income inequality leads to more extreme party position. They argue that this behavior helps parties to continue to serve their voters’ interests. Furthermore, Cox (1990), based on the median-voter-theory, presents electoral systems’ centrifugal and centripetal incentives for parties. We assume that these two independent variables both have a mutual impact on each other and, at the same time, influence party positioning on a left-right scale. We argue that an increase in income inequality leads to more extreme ideological positions only in those cases where electoral systems are permissive. Using a TSCS dataset to examine this interactive impact of income inequality and electoral system characteristics on parties’ programmatic positions, we find that this assumption applies. Parties only move to positions on the margins of the left-right dimension to accommodate more important income equality if electoral institutions provide them incentives to do so.