ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Role of parliaments in national anti-corruption strategies

Democracy
Governance
Parliaments
Public Administration
Qualitative Comparative Analysis
Corruption
Policy-Making
Franklin De Vrieze
Westminster Foundation for Democracy
Franklin De Vrieze
Westminster Foundation for Democracy

Abstract

In line with the United Nations Convention Against Corruption, over 70 countries have issued a national anti-corruption strategy (NACS) or a set of documents that together constitute a comprehensive anti-corruption framework. Our hypothesis is that most NACS focus on traditional responses to combating corruption through more rules, compliance regimes and enforcement and are only to a limited extend promoting integrity across the public and private sector. Our first research question is to what extent the new NACS (2021-2025) in two European countries (Ukraine and North Macedonia) are aiming for strengthening the traditional, rules and enforcement regimes or are aiming for promoting integrity as well; and what have been the rationale, incentives, and relevant external context. [ref. Oxford University integrity framework]. Our second research question is how parliament is involved in the new NACS in both countries; and to what extent parliaments are “actors of change” in moving from the traditional to the new approach. The analysis will be guided by five indicators of parliament’s role regarding NACS: input in diagnosis of corruption challenges, approval of NACS, ensuring effective implementation of anti-corruption measures, monitoring and evaluating of implementation of NACS, interaction with the lead agency for coordination of NACS.