ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

When environmental and authoritarian discourses collide: marketing green nationalism in China

China
Environmental Policy
Governance
Green Politics
International Relations
National Identity
Constructivism
Domestic Politics
Virginie Arantes
University of Oxford
Virginie Arantes
University of Oxford

Abstract

In the battle for global legitimacy, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has learned to take advantage of the public consensus regarding the need to be more environmentally sustainable. The “ecological civilisation” rhetoric—which integrates environmental protection in the nation’s authoritarian political system—has become a key political slogan nationally and abroad. This state-led “sinicised” version of environmentalism frees the regime from the trajectory of Western societies and function as a charm offensive to the failures of slow-paced and plural decision-making processes under liberal-democracies. This paper takes green nationalism as its main theoretical focus to contribute to theory-building by conceptualising green nationalism in China’s authoritarian context. Building on ethnographic observations in Shanghai, a Metropole aspiring to put China at the top of the list of the world’s most sustainable cities, and qualitative analysis of Chinese leaders’ discourses, it proposes a more nuanced and contextual understanding of how China’s authoritarian regime mine environmental discourses to enhance its legitimacy at national and international levels. Drawing on constructivist political theory that views nationalism as an everyday performance, the paper introduces novel ways to understand the implications of the instrumentalization of the environmental sphere by China’s authoritarian regime. A close study of discourses and actions will (1) provide stronger clues into formulations of green nationalism and (2) highlight the different ways in which the internationally ascribed obligations and norms of climate change are appropriated, calibrated, and legitimated to forge national identity, national interests and claims to legitimacy in authoritarian settings.