ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Developing a practice-oriented approach for the study of intergovernmental decision-making – the case of the practice of consensus in the Council

European Union
Political Methodology
Qualitative
Decision Making
Narratives
Kamil Ławniczak
University of Warsaw
Kamil Ławniczak
University of Warsaw

Abstract

Decision-making in complex, highly institutionalised environments, such as the Council of the EU, encompasses many practices related to the conduct of negotiations. It is also essentially about storytelling and narrating: representatives narrate interests, policy positions, actions, attitudes, results of negotiations and decisions taken. Both practices and narratives are inherently relational – they cannot exist otherwise. This paper explores some theoretical and methodological facets of practice-oriented research, with special focus on its relational and narrative aspects. Practices in intergovernmental decision-making can be performed more or less competently; they can ensure continuity or express change; there might be tensions and contradictions between them. Here, I focus on ways in which thinking in terms of relations rather than entities, and studying stories and narratives help explore the understandings, tensions, and decision-making consequences of the practices of consensus in the Council of the European Union. I argue that the performance of a practice is always relational and context-dependent – in particular regarding the evaluation of its competence and what it brings about. Moreover, the paper shows that narratives are closely related to the understanding of practices. I ask where we can find narratives relevant to the decision-making practices and how we can combine narrative analysis with practice theory. I try to show how analysing narratives and noticing narrative tension provides clues regarding the conflicts, hierarchies, and hidden power structures within ostensibly cooperative, consensus-based environments. Finally, as an empirical illustration, I turn to the case of the practice of consensus. I show how the somewhat eclectic methodological apparatus developed in the paper can help us understand one of the issues related to the promises of practice turn: the notion of "competent performance" of a practice.