Social media serve as vital platforms for social movements and counter-movements to mobilize support, exchange ideas, and engage in public discourse across national boundaries. This study examines the transnational interactions shaping the Czech climate change debate, which is defined by the contestation between two social movements: climate advocates and climate obstructionists. Drawing on social movement theory, particularly the concepts of resource mobilization and framing, the research investigates how these groups leverage transnational networks to legitimize their positions, access resources, and influence public opinion. Previous studies suggest that such interactions are instrumental in amplifying narratives, fostering solidarity, and adapting strategies to local and global contexts. Using social network analysis, we analyze the structural patterns of these interactions, focusing on the influence of actors’ belief systems, organizational characteristics, and national contexts.
