Populist parties have gained substantial ground in many EU member states over the past decade, with some of them even entering government. This workshop asks whether populist governments change the content and the style of EU policymaking. Drawing on Taggart’s concept of ‘unpolitics’, we ask whether populist governments adopt a destructive approach to EU policymaking that is genuinely different from that of mainstream governments. We invite papers from a wide range of policy areas to see whether and, if so, how populist governments have changed EU policymaking to jointly theorise the conditions under which they behave differently from mainstream parties.
Populist parties have gained substantial ground in many European member states, especially since the various polycrisis (notably the Eurozone and refugee crises). Yet, we still do not know how they have affected EU politics and whether they have changed policymaking processes and output in any significant way. Scholars of populism have usually argued that populist parties differ from mainstream ones in many important ways. For instance, they tend to present themselves as defenders of the interest of the ‘pure people’ as opposed to the ‘corrupt [Brussel’s] elite’ (Mudde and Kaltwasser 2017, p. 6). This would suggest that they are more likely to block decisions at the EU level and and engage in traditional politics involving horse-trading; instead, we expect them to stick to their pure and uncompromised positions. Indeed, our own research in the area of migration policies (Zaun and Ripoll Servent 2023) has shown that populist governments sometimes block policies that would benefit their own countries in order to keep crises alive. Thus, we invite papers using different methodologies to explore systematically across different policy areas whether and how populist governments differ in EU policymaking and to jointly develop a more coherent framework on the role of populist governments in EU politics. Our aim is to find the scope conditions under which populist governments engage in ‘unpolitics’, understood as instances where populist actors ‘engage[ ] with politics but in a way that is at odds with that politics’ (Taggart, 2018, p. 81).
Bressanelli, E., Koop, C., & Reh, C. (2020). EU Actors under pressure: Politicisation and depoliticisation as strategic responses. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 329–341.
Kelemen, R. D. (2020). The European Union’s authoritarian equilibrium. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 481–499.
Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). What is populism? In Populism: A Very Short Introduction (pp. 1–20). Oxford University Press.
Novak, S. (2013). The Silence of Ministers: Consensus and Blame Avoidance in the Council of the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(6), 1091–1107.
Pircher, B., & Farjam, M. (2021). Oppositional voting in the Council of the EU between 2010 and 2019: Evidence for differentiated politicisation. European Union Politics, 22(3), 472–494.
Schimmelfennig, F. (2020). Politicisation management in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 342–361.
Taggart, P. (2018). Populism and ‘Unpolitics’. In G. Fitzi, J. Mackert, & B. S. Turner (Eds.), Populism and the Crisis of Democracy (pp. 79–87). Routledge.
Voltolini, B., Natorski, M., & Hay, C. (2020). Introduction: The politicisation of permanent crisis in Europe. Journal of European Integration, 42(5), 609–624.
Zaun, N., & Ripoll Servent, A. (2023). Perpetuating Crisis as a Supply Strategy: The Role of (Nativist) Populist Governments in EU Policymaking on Refugee Distribution. Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(3), 653–672.
Zeitlin, J., Nicoli, F., & Laffan, B. (2019). Introduction: The European Union beyond the polycrisis? Integration and politicization in an age of shifting cleavages. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(7), 963–976.
Potential participants:
Paul Taggart, University of Sussex
Karolina Pomorska, University of Leiden
Ana Juncos, University of Bristol
Julian Bergmann, Christine Hackenesch and Niels Keijzer, German Institute of Development and Sustainability
Ezel Tabur, University of Aberdeen
Henning Deters, University of Vienna
Mariia Tepliakova, University of Salzburg
Robert Csehi, Technical University Munich (TUM)
1: Do populist governments differ from mainstream ones in EU policymaking? If yes, how?
2: Do they take a different approach to policymaking (unpolitics) or is it situational (depends on further conditions)?
3: How has the ascent of populist governments in the EU affected EU policy outputs and outcomes?
4: How do mainstream actors deal with the presence of populist governments in EU policymaking?
5: Are all populist governments the same in their behaviour or do we see differences depending on their host ideology?
Title |
Details |
Business as Usual? Impact of Populist Governments on the Negotiation of EU’s Accession to the Istanbul Convention in the Council of the European Union |
View Paper Details
|
High risk/high gain: Soft “unpolitics” in joint vaccine procurement |
View Paper Details
|
Populists in the shadow of unanimity: contestation of EU foreign and security policy in the Council of the EU. |
View Paper Details
|
Populists in government and budgetary policy of the EU |
View Paper Details
|
Unpolitical European Security: Party Competition changes and Italy's effects on the EU CFSP/CSDP |
View Paper Details
|
Negotiating the New Pact on Migration: Central European interest-advocacy in Council of the EU |
View Paper Details
|
EU Militant Democracy: Remapping the European Parliament Agenda-Setting and Veto Power Prerogatives |
View Paper Details
|
Beware Of Greeks Bearing Unpolitics: Explaining the Populist SYRIZA-ANEL Government's Role During the 2015 Troika-Bailout Negotiations |
View Paper Details
|
War in Ukraine: Breaking the unpolitical alliance against the EU? |
View Paper Details
|
Genuine Target or Collateral Damage? Analysing the influence of Populist Radical Right governments on the EU’s Development Policy |
View Paper Details
|
The Power of Unpolitics |
View Paper Details
|
The patterns of tacit and explicit collusion on EU policy-making: the Hungarian case |
View Paper Details
|