Ritual, eventful, exceptional: the conceptualisation and symbolic articulation of time is central in the development and in the study of collective action. Collective action cannot be analysed only at a certain moment in the present and is often understood as constituting sequences, such as in the concepts of 'cycles of protest' (Tarrow 1993). Research on climate movements – which emphasise temporal registers like urgency and deadlines – has reignited this longstanding interest in temporality. The workshop aims to broaden this renewed interest by exploring how imagined, contested or ‘objectively imposed’ temporalities shape and are shaped by social movements.
Social movement studies have long referred to the fact that social actors engage with time in different ways, such as in analyses of the ritualistic nature of the repertoire of contention (Tilly 1978), of the role of events and critical junctures (della Porta 2008; 2020), of latency and abeyance (Melucci 1989; Taylor 1989), and of the narrative construction of spontaneity (Polletta 2006). Furthermore, the literature has seen in the last few years increasing contamination with memory studies (Daphi and Zamponi 2019) and a growing interest towards how actors engage with the future (Tavory and Eliasoph 2013; Mische 2014; Cassegård and Thörn 2018), especially within the context of the climate emergency (de Moor and Marquardt 2023). Attempts to propose more comprehensive visions of the topic have been made (McAdam and Sewell 2001; Gillan and Edwards 2020) but more needs to be done, especially in the present context, significantly characterised by the presence of emergencies, as in the case of climate change or of the Covid-19 pandemic (Yates et al. 2024). Moving beyond subjective notions of time, some are now raising questions about the ‘objective’ temporality imposed on social movements by the ‘nature’ of problems those movements address (de Moor, forthcoming). The goal of this workshop is to bridge recent findings on collective action vis-à-vis the climate emergency with research on different fields and trajectories of mobilisation, in an attempt to propose a more comprehensive vision of the relationship between temporalities – understood as both objective and subjective – and political action.
Cassegård, Carl, and Håkan Thörn. 2018. ‘Toward a Postapocalyptic Environmentalism? Responses to Loss and Visions of the Future in Climate Activism’. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 1 (4): 561–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618793331.
Daphi, Priska, and Lorenzo Zamponi. 2019. ‘Exploring the Movement-Memory Nexus: Insights and Ways Forward’. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 24 (4): 399–417. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-24-4-399.
de Moor, Joost, and Jens Marquardt. 2023. ‘Deciding Whether It’s Too Late: How Climate Activists Coordinate Alternative Futures in a Postapocalyptic Present’. Geoforum 138 (January):103666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.103666
della Porta, Donatella. 2008. ‘Eventful Protest, Global Conflicts’. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 9 (2): 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2008.9672963.
———. 2020. ‘Protests as Critical Junctures: Some Reflections towards a Momentous Approach to Social Movements’. Social Movement Studies 19 (5–6): 556–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1555458.
Gillan, Kevin, and Gemma Edwards. 2020. ‘Time for Change’. Social Movement Studies 19 (5–6): 501–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1806813.
Koopmans, Ruud. 2004. ‘Protest in Time and Space: The Evolution of Waves of Contention’. In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule, Bert Klandermans, and Doug McAdam, 19–46. Oxford: Blackwell.
McAdam, Doug, and William H. Sewell. 2001. ‘It’s About Time: Temporality in the Study of Social Movements and Revolutions’. In Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, edited by Ronald R. Aminzade, Jack A. Goldstone, Doug McAdam, Elizabeth J. Perry, William H. Sewell, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly, 89–125. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511815331.
Melucci, Alberto. 1989. Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. London: Hutchinson Radius.
Mische, Ann. 2014. ‘Measuring Futures in Action: Projective Grammars in the Rio + 20 Debates’. Theory and Society 43 (3): 437–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9226-3.
Polletta, Francesca. 2006. It Was Like a Fever: Storytelling in Protest and Politics. University of Chicago Press. http://www.bibliovault.org/BV.landing.epl?ISBN=9780226673769.
Tarrow, Sidney. 1993. ‘Cycles of Collective Action: Between Moments of Madness and the Repertoire of Contention’. Social Science History 17 (2): 281–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/1171283.
Tavory, Iddo, and Nina Eliasoph. 2013. ‘Coordinating Futures: Toward a Theory of Anticipation’. American Journal of Sociology 118 (4): 908–42. https://doi.org/10.1086/668646.
Taylor, Verta. 1989. ‘Social Movement Continuity: The Women’s Movement in Abeyance’. American Sociological Review 54 (5): 761. https://doi.org/10.2307/2117752.
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Mcgraw-Hill College.
Yates, L., Daniel, A., Gerharz, E., & Feldman, S. (2024). Introduction to the Special Issue: Foregrounding social movement futures: collective action, imagination, and methodology. Social Movement Studies, 23(4), 429-445.
1: What temporalities are imagined by activists across different movements and what accounts for these differences?
2: How are objective problem temporalities reflected in the movements addressing those problems?
3: What are the consequences of imagined temporalities on movements’ organization, strategy and outcomes?
4: What is the relative importance of various temporal aspects across movements, and what explains such differences?
5: What are the broader societal consequences of movements’ temporal imaginaries and contestations?
Title |
Details |
Beyond Frequency: Incorporating Time in the Analysis of Political Party Participation in Protests |
View Paper Details
|
Timewealth: Reclaiming time for a post-growth future |
View Paper Details
|
The Three Temporalities of Student Politics in Egypt |
View Paper Details
|
Movements and Memory in Post-Violence Times: Between Mnemonic Traditions and Generational Change |
View Paper Details
|
Anxiety, rage, frustration… and back again: Inquiring into the temporal dimensions of emotions in climate justice movements |
View Paper Details
|
Deadlines as drivers of action: How temporal discontinuity shapes movements |
View Paper Details
|
Planning the future amidst shifting temporalities. The case of Italian social movement actors |
View Paper Details
|
Typologies of Transformation: Emotional, Cognitive, and Relational Liberations in the Gezi Protests |
View Paper Details
|
Nuclear Winter vs. Carbon Summer: How Temporalities of Threats Shape the Taboo Advocacy in Anti-Nuclear and Anti-Fossil Fuel Movements |
View Paper Details
|
Constructing Collective Action for Digital Rights in Europe: Addressing the Relevance of Events in Collective Action Processes |
View Paper Details
|
Objective and subjective temporality in processes of anti-immigrant political violence |
View Paper Details
|
Understanding strategy in contentious collective action: a research agenda |
View Paper Details
|
Looking Back, Moving Forward: Movement History, Movement Strategy |
View Paper Details
|
Critical junctures and collective responses: transfeminist times in Italy, 2008 and 2020 |
View Paper Details
|
Temporalities and territory: present, past and future in the struggles of traditional communities and environmentalists in Brazil |
View Paper Details
|
Reimagining Climate Futures beyond Post-Political Temporalities – Strategic and Affective Responses to Tensions in Climate Activism |
View Paper Details
|
The Study the Temporality of Social Movements: An Analytical Approach |
View Paper Details
|
Ensemble Interventions: Public interest scenario work as field-bridging projects |
View Paper Details
|