ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

A Union Without Borders? Conflictive Rationalities and Actors’ Strategies Between EU Mobility Dynamics and National Welfare States

Citizenship
European Union
Migration
Social Policy
Welfare State
Immigration
Comparative Perspective
Member States
P016
Roberta Perna
Universidad Autònoma de Madrid – Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos del CSIC
Inés Calzada
Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Tuesday 09:00 - 10:45 BST (25/08/2020)

Abstract

The nexus between EU mobility and welfare states is a cornerstone of EU citizenship. Without movement, there would be no need for supranational laws to regulate EU citizens’ welfare entitlements in the territory of another Member State. At the same time, cross-border welfare entitlements constitute a precondition for the exercise of freedom of movement for EU migrants. In the last decade, however, several Member States have voiced – and acted – to re-establish national boundaries of welfare in a Union without borders. A great deal has been written about the ‘restrictive turn’ taking place in supranational laws, the Court of Justice’ decisions, and Member States’ policies to limit mobile EU citizens’ cross-border welfare entitlements. What seems less clear to date is whether there is a shared policy logic behind it across Member States. What rationalities orient Member States’ policy strategies towards different forms of EU mobility in/outflows? Are they consistent across countries’ welfare regimes? Do they represent a response to mobility-induced challenges to the solidarity logic of the welfare state? Or do they constitute an instrument of mobility control? At the same time, how these policy strategies interplay with and shape mobile EU citizens’ mobility patterns? How do different EU citizens’ groups respond – and counter-react – to Member States’ strategies? This panel aims to contribute to the understanding of the welfare-EU mobility nexus from a comparative perspective. It particularly welcomes contributions that unveil (potentially conflictive) rationalities at the level of Member States’ welfare regimes and mobile EU citizens’ mobility strategies.

Title Details
Transnational Vs. National Solidarity: The Political Framing of Immigration as a Threat to the Welfare State and Societal Solidarity Exemplified by the Case of Pre-BREXIT UK View Paper Details
The Backlash of Free Movement: Does Internal EU Migration Fuel Anti-Immigration Views? View Paper Details
Use of Public Social Services by Retirement Migrants in Spain View Paper Details
Freedom of Movement and Cross-Border Healthcare Entitlements. The Role of Member States of Origin in Challenging EU Citizenship View Paper Details