Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Wednesday 10:30 - 12:15 BST (26/08/2020)
Judicial Dialogue is one of the most widely used, while at the same time most contested, concepts in the research on law and courts. The interaction between domestic courts and the Court of Justice of the European Union is often labelled as a judicial dialogue, especially due to the existence of the unique preliminary ruling procedure. This panel revisits the concept seeking to analyse the mutual dependence between domestic courts and CJEU, describing its character, role perceptions of both CJEU and national judges, and the motives behind nurturing or withdrawing from the interaction.
Title | Details |
---|---|
Explaining the Puzzle of Dutch Non-Referral to the CJEU of Economic Migration from Outside the EU | View Paper Details |
Network Analysis of Transjurisdictional Citations in Judicial Opinions: Sources of Persuasive Authority in the Inter-Court Dialogue | View Paper Details |
That's and Order! | View Paper Details |
The Referring Court’s Influence on the EU Court of Justice Judgment | View Paper Details |
Active or Passive: The National Judges’ Views on the Preliminary Ruling Procedure | View Paper Details |