ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

How Autocrats Communicate Bad News: COVID-19 and Other Crises

Comparative Politics
Political Leadership
Political Violence
Communication
Narratives
Political Ideology
Political Regime
State Power
P500
Maria Josua
German Institute for Global And Area Studies
Seraphine F. Maerz
University of Melbourne
Alexander Dukalskis
University College Dublin

Friday 11:15 - 13:00 BST (28/08/2020)

Abstract

The global Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted massive discrepancies in governance around the globe. Not only do the practical measures to manage the public health crisis display large variation. Also, the communication strategies that governments employ differ markedly. Especially in autocracies, official discourse ranges from downplaying the severity of the crisis, spreading conspiracy theories or fake news, to justifying restrictions of fundamental rights. Official discourse on the Corona pandemic is a lens through which one can study the interplay of legitimation and repression in autocracies. The current pandemic is but one example where we can witness a broad variety of communication strategies. Natural disasters or societal challenges such as popular protests also trigger divergent framings by incumbents. Such phenomena have the potential to expose the incumbents’ weaknesses and challenge existing power relations. Therefore, political decisions for framing bad news in a certain way are not only informed by factual exigencies, but also reflect considerations of regime security, legitimacy, and the possibility for unrest. This is also true for communicating “bad news” that incumbent autocrats themselves have afflicted upon their citizens: political repression, be it against specific protests, targeted activists, or the population more broadly. Repression may be framed in certain ways, downplayed, or even denied. This panel investigates the interplay of political communication and crisis under authoritarianism. It sketches theoretical and conceptual approaches for studying the framing of challenging situations in autocracies and analyses empirical cases of political communication during the Covid-19 pandemic globally, in Africa, the Middle East, and China.

Title Details
Causing and Communicating Bad News: How Autocrats Legitimize Repression View Paper Details
Pandemic Backsliding: Public Communication and Autocratization during Crises View Paper Details
Producing Institutional Resilience Through Crisis Narratives: The Case of Covid-19 in Uganda View Paper Details
From Solidarity to a Militarized Health Defense: The Evolution of Calls for National Unity amidst the Coronavirus Crisis in Iran View Paper Details
How the Chinese Party-State Uses Public Criticism to Reframe the Corona Crisis View Paper Details