ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Stakeholder Participation in Bureaucratic Politics and Policymaking

Participation
Policy
TOU022
Adriana Bunea
Universitetet i Bergen
Caelesta Braun
Departments of Political Science and Public Administration, Universiteit Leiden

Building: C, Floor: 2, Room: MC202

Tuesday 09:00 - 17:00 CEST (25/04/2023)

Wednesday 09:00 - 17:00 CEST (26/04/2023)

Thursday 09:00 - 17:00 CEST (27/04/2023)

Friday 09:00 - 17:00 CEST (28/04/2023)

The participation of stakeholders (citizens and interest groups) in public policymaking represents a key feature of 21st century systems of democratic governance (OECD 2022). This development is particularly relevant for non-majoritarian institutions such as executive bureaucracies and regulatory agencies for which stakeholder participation represents a unique opportunity to address their democratic deficit and consolidate their institutional power, legitimacy and reputation (Braun & Busuioc, 2020). The rise of stakeholder participation in policymaking was matched by increasing levels of academic attention and scholarship dispersed across different subfields of political science (Bunea 2020a). For example, interest group research mostly examines the role of public consultations as venues of interest representation and influence over policymaking (Bunea 2013, Klüver 2013, Rasmussen et al. 2014). Public policy scholarship considers stakeholder participation an important instrument for better regulation reforms aimed at enhancing the evidence-based and the participatory and deliberative credentials of regulatory policymaking (Rimkutė 2020a, Bunea and Chrisp 2022). Public administration scholarship emphasizes the role of stakeholder participation as an administrative procedure with important implications for interinstitutional relations and the politics of bureaucratic discretion, reputation and autonomy (Braun 2012, Moffitt 2014, Potter 2019, Rimkutė, 2020, Bunea 2020b, Bunea and Nørbech 2022, Rimkutė 2020b). A critical overview of existing research reveals that current studies have largely talked past each other, although they investigate closely related aspects of citizen and interest groups’ participation in public policymaking. Consequently, the impact of stakeholder participation on bureaucratic policymaking has remained largely under-theorized and empirically underexamined. Several factors account for this gap. First, across subfields of political science, scholars employ different assumptions about and definitions of stakeholder participation in policymaking. This in turn poses important challenges to academic dialogue and to the cumulative progress of research and knowledge about the impact of stakeholder participation on bureaucratic politics and policymaking. Second, existing research provides only fragmented and insufficiently developed causal mechanisms regarding the direct and indirect effects of stakeholder participation on the inputs, processes, and outputs of bureaucratic policymaking. Together, this results in limited analytical leverage of existing theoretical models and empirical research, which fails to match the societal and political relevance attributed to stakeholder participation in contemporary democratic systems of governance. Our Workshop aims to address this challenge. To build a more integrative and comprehensive approach to the systematic study of stakeholder participation in bureaucratic politics and policymaking, we invite Papers tackling one or several of the following themes: 1. Stakeholder participation as an institution of bureaucratic politics and policymaking 2. Impact of stakeholder participation on bureaucratic politics and policymaking 3. Challenges and opportunities of stakeholder participation for non-majoritarian institutions in the inter-institutional balance of power 4. Methodological advancements in the comparative study of stakeholder participation in executive policymaking

This Workshop invites conceptual, theoretical, empirical, and methodological Papers that address one or several of the four themes in the description. Studies that adopt a (broadly defined) comparative, cross-national or multi-level, empirical research design are particularly welcome. We encourage submission of conceptual / theoretical papers that propose an innovative and original conceptualization of stakeholder participation in policymaking, and empirical contributions that employ new data sources and innovative research designs. Our Workshop is open to scholars from all regions and academic ranks. We hope to gather a group of ‘stakeholder participation’ and ‘bureaucratic policymaking’ enthusiasts that includes established and emerging scholars, doing research in different subfields of political science. We aim for our Workshop to serve as an inspiring networking opportunity and a stepping-stone towards a new research agenda and fruitful future research collaborations. A medium-term objective is the submission of an edited special issue to a relevant journal, with several Papers presented as part of the Workshop.

Title Details
Public Consultations and Stakeholder Support for Legislative Proposals: Evidence from the European Union View Paper Details
The lobbying battle for agenda-setting influence: a matter of broad societal support? View Paper Details
In the Midnight Hour: Administrative Rulemaking During Presidential Transitions View Paper Details
Using stakeholders to your advantage: An experiment on the effectiveness of reputation management instruments to gain authority View Paper Details
More detectors and effectors? The changing ability of citizens to interact and engage with the regulatory state View Paper Details
Comparing patterns of stakeholder participation in bureaucratic policymaking: explaining cross-domain differences View Paper Details
The European Commission’s consultation regime - consultative contraction and detraction View Paper Details
Symbolic, Strategic or Serendipitous? An Assessment of How Societal Stakeholders Use and Perceive Different Consultation Tools in EU policymaking. View Paper Details
Reaching out and fitting in: On the challenges government officials face to engage external stakeholders View Paper Details
The political uses of civil society in bureaucratic policymaking: The European Commission and migration policy View Paper Details
Does diversity matter? An experimental study of the effects of participation mechanisms on perceived legitimacy of bureaucratic rulemaking View Paper Details
Who needs interest groups’ information? When and why bureaucratic top officials interact with stakeholders in policymaking: a Southern European perspective. View Paper Details
How the European Commission Makes the Better Regulation Agenda Work: Outsourcing and the Involvement of Private Consultants in Online Public Consultations View Paper Details
The rewriting of government bills: the (ir)relevance of interest organizations View Paper Details
Public Consultations on Regulatory Impact Assessments and their (potentially undesirable) effect on citizen trust on regulatory agencies View Paper Details
Mapping Influence in Stakeholder Consultations: A Comparison of Different Approaches View Paper Details
Bending the rules: procedural Politicking in the Bureaucracy View Paper Details
Making Policy Public: Next Steps and Extensions View Paper Details