Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
In person icon Building: Technicum 2, Floor: 3, Room: Auditorium G
Wednesday 11:00 - 12:30 CEST (10/07/2024)
How do existing cross-national and longitudinal surveys measure the concepts of gender equality, gender+, intersectionality and fertility across various geographical locations and time periods? The papers on this panel present the results from two Horizon Europe Sister projects: Push*Back*Lash and UNTWIST as well as empirical research that relies on the assessment of survey measures. The teams have systematically gathered and evaluated survey items aimed at measuring gender+, gender equality, fertility, and intersectionality concepts in international (International Social Survey Programme and World Value Survey), European (European Values Survey, European Social Survey, and Eurobarometer), and national surveys from six countries (the UK, Germany, Denmark, Spain, Switzerland, and Hungary) that span over three decades. The primary findings underscore a partial alignment between multidimensional concepts and the methods used for their measurement. Addressing these measurement gaps is important to advance survey research and empirical analysis of public attitudes on gender+ issues and intersectional inequalities.
Title | Details |
---|---|
Alignment Between Free Text and Close-ended Responses for Gender and Sexuality | View Paper Details |
The representation of public opinion towards gender in Europe: What do survey questions measure? | View Paper Details |
How do surveys measure inresectional inequalities: findings and recommendations | View Paper Details |
Decoding short-term fertility intentions: exploring the nexus of gender equality and societal factors in comparative gender regimes EU analysis | View Paper Details |
Feminist measures in four international surveys: an analysis | View Paper Details |