ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Controversies on religion and secularity in recent political debates II

Cleavages
Comparative Politics
Conflict
Religion
P102
Danielle Pullan
Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies – MPIfG
Kirsten Smeets
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
Danielle Pullan
Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies – MPIfG

Building: O'Brien Centre for Sciences, Floor: Ground, Room: Intel Theatre

Monday 14:00 - 15:45 BST (12/08/2024)

Abstract

Contrary to expectations of secularization theorists of the 20st century, religion has remained an important and contested issue in political controversies in the 21st century. First, this can be traced back to increasing religious pluralization or, more concretely, to the establishment of Muslim communities and the enhanced visibility of their religion in societies which have por-trayed themselves as Christian and/or secular. Second, religion has increasingly become a security issue against the backdrop of terrorist attacks particularly committed by religious extremists. Third, changing moral concepts in liberal democracies with regard to, for instance, family values, gender equality or LGBT rights have prompted actors such as religious parties to defend their more conservative point of views against liberalizing reform efforts by progressive parties. This panel focuses on political debates on issues that have contributed to the revival of the religious-secular cleavage. The aim is to get a better understanding of recent discourses on these issues and patterns of political controversies along this cleavage. Researchers that deal with politics on issues such as the accommodation of religious pluralization, morality politics or religious extremism are invited to submit a proposal. Empirical papers applying single case studies are as welcome as those employing comparative perspectives.

Title Details
Securitization, Normalization, and Representation of Islam in Parliamentary Discourse: A Comparative Perspective View Paper Details
Religion, secularization and party politics – an insight view View Paper Details
Religious reasons and democratic deliberation: A critique of secularistic approaches View Paper Details