ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Religion and Illiberal Politics I: Challenges and Common Patterns in Comparative Perspectives - Governing Religion

Democracy
Governance
Islam
National Identity
Religion
Immigration
Comparative Perspective
Liberalism
P320
Anja Hennig
Europa-Universität Viadrina
Mika Luoma-Aho
University of Lapland

Building: BL20 Helga Engs hus, Floor: 2, Room: HE 234

Friday 11:00 - 12:40 (08/09/2017)


Abstract

This panel aims at empirically and theoretically analyzing the ideological, structural, and historical linkages between religion and “illiberal politics”; thus populist, rightwing, nationalist rhetoric, programs, conflicts and actors. In conceptual terms this implies to include several approaches dealing with political contestation in democratic systems to the broader concept of illiberal politics. A striking example is populism as an anti-pluralistic programmatic that relies on a clear distinction between an imagined “we” as the true leaders of “the people” and “them” as a corrupt elite ruling against “the people”. In their recent edited book, Mazouki, McDonnell and Roy convincingly show that more often then not populists tend to hijack religion. Whereas populists talk about identity and Churches about faith, religion bears the potential to serve populist identity politics. At the same time, however, the role of religion itself is fundamental to examine identity, the state and institutional actors in comparative political studies. As noted by Jose Casanova (2006), the impact of secularization provides the Churches opportunities to emerge and enter the social and political discourse. And GrzymaÅ‚a-Busse examined in her comparative contributions on the role of the Churches to what extent they can maximize their policy influence (GrzymaÅ‚a-Busse 2012, 2015). In 2015, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, addressed the contemporary struggle against extremism. In his more recent words, all the major world faith traditions shows ‘a group that cannot tolerate diversity’, a violent attitude, that, in his words, ‘we’ve not seen in Christianity, since the end of the wars of Reformation… the theological narrative [seems to] fill[ing] a vacuum left by an alternative narrative.’ It is this vacuum that the return to more identitarian narratives, growing perceived immigration and security threats, and the social challenges of the recent financial and economic crisis have filled and seen the rise of an alliance between religion and illiberal politics. Paper givers will address the following questions: 1) How can we conceptually approach the observed linkages between religion (theologies, values, actors) and illiberal politics in terms of populist, right-wing, Eurosceptic, nationalist rhetoric, programs, conflicts and actors? 2) How and why do illiberal actors use religion? 3) How and why do religious actors ally with illiberal actors? 4) From a comparative perspective: Which different pattern of religious illiberalism or the illiberal appropriation of religion can be observed? Under which conditions do illiberal religious and/or political actors cooperate?

Title Details
Religion as 'Authoritarian’ Counterweight to the idea of Liberal Democracy? A Theoretical and Historical Approach View Paper Details
Shake Hands? From Classroom to Headlines to Parliament. New Dynamics in Public Policy on Religion in Switzerland View Paper Details
How Religion came into Play: Religion as a Category of Practice in Immigrant Integration Policies View Paper Details