ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Examining local democratic innovations – a meta-analytical approach

Democracy
Local Government
Political Participation
Referendums and Initiatives
Quantitative
Pamela Hess
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Marco Brehme
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Brigitte Geißel
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Pamela Hess
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt

Abstract

Whereas case studies on local democratic innovations are widespread, there are fewer investigations on local citizen participation procedures across a large set of case studies. The purpose of this paper is to present first findings of a pilot study that examines the effects of various dialog-oriented procedures – namely Participatory Budgeting and Local Agenda 21 – in Germany. In recent years a few attempts have been made to systematize and analyze case studies on dialog-oriented procedures. Most of these studies are available as narrative synopses. These narrative synopses are helpful, but are unable to provide a big picture about actual effects of dialog-oriented procedures. How can up to now scattered findings be accumulated? We suggest a methodological approach novel in this field, namely a statistical meta-analysis of case study findings. However, a multitude of challenges are accompanied by this approach. Findings of mostly qualitative studies cannot be transformed easily into a meta-analytical data set. They need special ‘transformation’ and ‘handling’. In our paper we discuss the pros and cons of using a large-n meta-analysis to examine case study data in the field of local democratic innovations, and we provide insights into effects of local dialog-oriented procedures on the participating individual (micro), on the deliberating group (meso) and on policies as well as on the whole citizenry (macro).