Understanding the Post-Factual Through Emotions

“Post-Truth” was pronounced the word of the year in 2016. What followed was a vivid defence of truth by scientists, journalists, and politicians. It seems we are on our way to abandoning the notion of truth as we know it, if we consider the raging against academic knowledge during Brexit debate or coming from the Trump administration. Scientists should raise their voices against the trend, and civil society should fight post-factualism. Yet, exactly what should be said and done? Analysing the interplay of scientific knowledge with politics, the paper examines truth as ‘sound knowledge’ - the cornerstone of evidence-based policy analysis - through the lenses of emotions. The paper argues that post-factual politics is a result of the way emotions have been placed outside of truth production by policy analysts. Evidence-based political responsibility calling for the integration of scientific knowledge engendered the dichotomy of civil rationality being threatened by uncivil emotionality. As a result, emotions have served as a way of delegitimizing both knowledge and the actors who harnessed emotions. Being consequently limited to tools of social movements and revolutions’ trump cards, emotions have been raised to virtues for those who are against the establishment; against accepted truth. The paper proposes to solve this puzzle by offering an analysis of emotions in truth production. As “performances of values and beliefs”, emotions enter evidence-making, they evaluate the range of actors and make them entitled to pronounce public concerns. As such, emotions have to be recognized as integral parts of policy analysis.