ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Personalized and Collegial Governments

Comparative Politics
Government
Comparative Perspective
Eyal Ben Shimol
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Gideon Rahat
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Eyal Ben Shimol
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Reuven Y. Hazan
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Gideon Rahat
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Abstract

The paper begins with an examination of research literature on government systems that identifies and relates to personalized and collegial elements within different government systems. It explores studies that acknowledge the differentiation between presidential and parliamentary government systems and studies that focus on the characteristics of executives. It then proposes a new analytical framework that differentiates between collegial and personalized government systems (including elements such as the power of the chief executive vis-à-vis the ministers, control over the composition of the cabinet, etc.). Next, it offers an operationalization of the proposed parameters. Finally, it examines government systems in several democracies, analyzing their variance and similarities. The analysis relies on constitutional sources and data collected by other researchers. The intent is to cover the following 28 democracies (though we expect that a few cases may be omitted due to lack of reliable data): Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and the United States.