Diversity or Fragmentation? Introducing Women’s Transnational Organizations Dataset

The classical definition of transnational feminist networks refers to the collective efforts of feminist activists and organizations that transcend national boundaries. These networks aim to address gender inequality and promote women’s rights on a global scale. They often collaborate through various means, such as sharing resources, exchanging knowledge, and advocating for policy changes that benefit women worldwide (Moghadam, 2000). Although the classical definition paints a rather optimistic picture of “unity in diversity” within the global feminist movement, I argue that nowadays the reality is much more complex and nuanced. The global women’s movement is not diversified and organized around specific issue areas but rather fragmented along ideological axes. While it is true that feminism aims to achieve gender equality, the various branches and perspectives within the movement often have different priorities and approaches. These differences can sometimes lead to tensions and disagreements, highlighting the diverse range of experiences and perspectives within feminism. To capture these differences, I introduce – Women’s Transnational Organizations Dataset, 1999-2021, with worldwide coverage. Based on the organizational mission statements as indicated in the Union of International Associations, the new dataset distinguishes two main axes of organizational fragmentation: gendered class and status inequalities. In the case of class inequalities, the axis goes from “progressive neoliberalism” to “social justice” goals, in the case of status – from “sameness feminism” to “difference feminism.” Previous datasets such as Women’s International Non-Governmental Organizations (WINGOs) and Transnational Social Movement Organizations (TSMO), which also included women’s organizations, did not focus on the issue of ideological fragmentation. The new dataset aims to address the gap by specifically examining the issue of ideological fragmentation within global women's organizations. By doing so, it provides a more comprehensive understanding of the diverse perspectives and ideologies within this sector, which can be crucial for analyzing their impact and effectiveness in promoting women's rights and empowerment at the global level. Additionally, this dataset allows for a more nuanced analysis of how ideological differences may shape collaborations and alliances among women's organizations at both national and international levels.