ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Deep Core Advocacy Coalitions

Public Policy
Coalition
Power
LGBTQI
Chris Weible
University of Colorado Denver
Chris Weible
University of Colorado Denver
Anna Crawford
University of Colorado Denver
Allegra Fullerton
University of Colorado Denver
Katie Imhoff
University of Colorado Denver
Giulia Mariani
Uppsala Universitet

Abstract

As one of the most established theoretical approaches to public policy, the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) has moored most of its theoretical arguments around a textbook policy conflict consisting of two or more advocacy coalitions in a mature adversarial policy subsystem set within an advanced polyarchy. However, much of ACF spans beyond the textbook – meaning there has been an implicit Framework behind the Framework. The purpose of this paper is fourfold. First, it summarizes the textbook ACF and then introduces the ACF’s broader Meta-Framework. Second, it shows how to take a step beyond the textbook by introducing deep core coalitions operating at the macro system. Third, it offers four illustrations of identity-based deep core coalitions bound by their transgender identity, abortion, traditionalist identity, and ruralness. Finally, the paper concludes with a discussion of what it means for a research program to embrace a diverse research agenda, such as through better linkages with other theoretical approaches, launching more comparative research designs, or, as done here, focusing on a new type of advocacy coalition operating at the macro system.