Emphasising emotions has become crucial in studying public policy and politics. Scholars explore different emotional dimensions: broad feelings like positivity and negativity, specific emotions like joy or fear, and comparative analyses of distinct emotions (eg shame, anger, compassion) (Sanchez, 2023; Fullerton/Weible, 2024). Emotions are not merely a backdrop but are increasingly recognised as a driving force that shapes politics and how policies are formed, debated, implemented, and more. This Joint Session aims to bring the methods for studying emotions to the foreground of our papers and discussions, fostering collaboration, and enriching our collective understanding without imposing a single methodology.
The growing recognition of emotions' role in shaping politics and policy underscores their profound influence. Examples include emotions interplaying with values and identities, shaping collective action, (de-)legitimizing actors, fueling policy conflicts, and impacting policy change (Durnová, 2022; Hornung & Bandelow, 2024; Kuhlmann/Starke, 2024). Researchers increasingly integrate emotions into their work, using diverse approaches and methodologies. This includes qualitative and quantitative techniques, manual and automated textual analysis, and orientations spanning interpretive to positivist.
However, there is a need to enhance these methodologies. This includes integrating insights from disciplines like psychology and sociology, which have long emphasised emotions. Regularly, methods of studying emotions remain obscure, with our trials and errors left outside the pages of published work. Furthermore, approaches frequently exist within academic silos, missing opportunities for learning and improvement.
We invite work exploring emotions from diverse perspectives and at various stages of development. We are open to dialogue across different methodological orientations – interpretive, positive, and more. Contributions do not need to present fully established methods; rather, we value openness to sharing successes and challenges encountered along the research path. While a primary focus is on methods, papers will naturally intertwine methods with relevant theories and concepts for better understanding emotions in policy and politics. Finally, we welcome contributions from scholars from all backgrounds and levels of experience. This session aims to foster a collaborative environment where diverse perspectives enrich our understanding of different methodologies for studying emotions in policy and politics.
Durnová, A. (2022). Making interpretive policy analysis critical and societally relevant: emotions, ethnography and language. Policy & Politics, 50(1), 43-58.
Fullerton, A. H., & Weible, C. M. (2024). Examining emotional belief expressions of advocacy coalitions in Arkansas' gender identity politics. Policy Studies Journal, 52(2), 369-389.
Hornung, J., & Bandelow, N. C. (2024). Social identities, emotions and policy preferences. Policy & Politics, 1-22.
Kuhlmann, J., & Starke, P. (2024). The politics of anger: emotional appraisal mechanisms and the French pension reform protests. Policy & Politics, 1-26.
Sanchez Salgado, R. M. (2023). The many faces of the politics of shame in European policymaking. Policy Sciences, 56(3), 525-547.
1: What shapes and is shaped by emotions?
2: How do the different methodological assumptions affect the ways emotions are studied?
3: What methodological approaches are being developed to collect and analyze data on emotions?
4: What are advantages and challenges or different methodologies to study emotions?
5: How can emotions be integrated in (existing) theories and frameworks?
Title |
Details |
The The role of emotions in advancing environmental norms: The case of the anti-PFAS norm in the United States |
View Paper Details
|
Is it Positive to be Negative? How Politicians (Shouldn’t) Present Themselves on X |
View Paper Details
|
Can Experts Afford an Emotion? The Effect of Emotional and Uncivil Expert Language on Public Perceptions about the Russo-Ukrainian War |
View Paper Details
|
FRAMING EMOTIONS: A SYNTHESIS FOR STUDYING SOCIAL MOVEMENTS AND POLITICS |
View Paper Details
|
Fractured Feelings: Character Affect Effects on Hydraulic Fracturing Policy Beliefs |
View Paper Details
|
Lessons from the Interpretive Emotions Analysis for the Advocacy Coalition Framework |
View Paper Details
|
(Dis)incentives, Features and Outcomes. The Threefold Relationship Between Deliberative Democratic Innovations and Participant’s ‘Bag of Emotions’ |
View Paper Details
|
From tax war euphoria to the fear of stigmatisation: Understanding affect and resistance to tax policy transfers |
View Paper Details
|
Unpacking the Layers of Emotions: Methodological Challenges and Insights in Deliberate Research on Poverty |
View Paper Details
|
Emotions as a Measure of the Intractability of Policy Conflict: An ACF-EBA Analysis of Wolf Reintroduction in Colorado |
View Paper Details
|
GuiltRoBERTa: An AI-assisted tool to uncover the emotional dynamics of blame rhetoric in Hungarian Politics. |
View Paper Details
|
Resistance to Expertise: Understanding Citizens' Emotional and Epistemic Challenges to Authority |
View Paper Details
|
Analyzing policy conflicts’ emotional climates: a mixed methods approach |
View Paper Details
|
Energized and emotional? How German and Italian Politicians emotionally narrate energy policy in the EU Elections 2024 |
View Paper Details
|
Researching emotions and emotion regulation among public officials through a quantitative diary study method |
View Paper Details
|
Emotions (re)negotiated? Deliberative methods for studying political emotions |
View Paper Details
|
Walking on Eggshells – Emotions in Transition |
View Paper Details
|
Discursive analysis of emotions across genres |
View Paper Details
|
Emotional democracy - Beyond the rationalized citizen. Harnessing the potential of emotions for public engagement |
View Paper Details
|
How policy-oriented emotions shape political preferences: comparing survey and brain-imaging methodology |
View Paper Details
|