Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Building: A - Faculty of Law, Floor: 4, Room: 407
Monday 10:45 - 12:30 CEST (04/09/2023)
Especially in times of crisis and austerity, political elites provide reasons why some individuals and social groups are more deserving of support than others (Van Oorschot, 2006). This might explain a resurgence of social group politics and the interest in group solidarity on the one hand, e.g. racial solidarity, migrant solidarity, and class solidarity; but on the other hand, solidarity towards outgroups such as transnational solidarity in the EU, both as dependent variable (Katsanidou et al., 2022) or independent variable (Pellegata & Visconti, 2022). This panel includes empirical studies investigating ingroup and outgroup solidarities within and between societies, but especially also the comparison hereof. Recently researchers have realized that political actors may use similar solidarity frames to endorse support for different social groups. In this sense overarching solidarity frames are akin to thin ideologies, going beyond specific social groups and/or specific issues (Stjerno, 2005). Solidarity frames explain under what conditions solidarity is supposed to arise and why. While such discursive devices were only rarely studied in the past (Kneuer et al. 2022) lately scholars started studying them in party manifestoes (Thijssen & Verheyen, 2022) and newspapers (Wallaschek, 2020). Secondly, this panel takes stock of these findings and presentations compare solidarity framing across time and/or space. Multiple studies have also studied public solidarity attitudes and actions, especially in the context of recent crises such as the Euro crisi, migration, Brexit, and COVID-19 pandemic (Lahusen & Grasso, 2018; Bremer et al. 2021). However, we do not know whether they are generalizable and congruent with the aforementioned supply-side studies. Is there adequate political representation of the preferences regarding solidarity? Moreover, we also don’t know whether crisis effects are specific and to what extent they are mediated by welfare state provisions. Hence, the panel also includes solidarity studies focusing on public solidarity preferences.
Title | Details |
---|---|
‘Sweet are the uses of adversity’: the consolidation of political support for supranational solidarity and the European polity in the aftermath of European crises from 2018 to 2022 | View Paper Details |
Political Solidarities in Novaland: Can we Simulate the Experience of States, Economies and Public Policies in a Virtual Online State? | View Paper Details |
Solidarity frames in Europe: Integrating partisan supply and public demand | View Paper Details |
European Union Solidarity or European Solidarity? The effect of European integration on citizens’ concern for the living conditions of other Europeans | View Paper Details |