Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
As democratic backsliding and rule of law challenges persist across Europe, the European Union faces mounting pressure to enforce democratic norms and respond to political contestation. This panel examines how different EU institutions and political actors engage with democratic resilience, institutional enforcement, and the politicization of rule of law mechanisms. Contributions analyze Hungarian MEPs' use of parliamentary questions to advance Eurosceptic and populist narratives, Poland’s 2023 elections as a case of external democratic resilience, and opposition party strategies in the European Parliament regarding democratic backsliding. Additionally, the panel investigates the European Commission’s internal decision-making in enforcing EU asylum law, as well as MEPs’ justifications for media freedom regulations, including the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) and anti-SLAPP directive. By exploring these institutional and political dynamics, this discussion sheds light on the EU’s capacity—and limitations—in safeguarding democracy and rule of law.
Title | Details |
---|---|
Avoidance, Attack, Awareness, and Action: Opposition Party Strategies on Democratic Backsliding in the European Parliament | View Paper Details |
Questioning Europe: Eurosceptic and Populist Use of European Parliamentary Questions by Hungarian MEPs | View Paper Details |
The External Dimension of Democratic Resilience: Lessons from Poland’s 2023 Elections | View Paper Details |
Democratic Backsliding and the Eurosceptic Factor | View Paper Details |