ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Back to Panel Details
Back to Panel Details

Various Post-colonies and their Relations to Former Colonial Powers

Constitutions
Development
Ethnic Conflict
Globalisation
Human Rights
Religion
Third World Politics
Trade
P454
Cathrine Thorleifsson
Universitetet i Oslo
Helge Hiram Jensen
European University Institute
Constitutional Complexity - State Theory after the New Political Anthropology

Thursday 15:50 - 17:30 (07/09/2017)

Building: BL07 P.A. Munchs hus Floor: 1 Room: PAM SEM10

Abstract

Empirical progress in political anthropology has resulted in more refined conceptual tools, which can shed new light on the histories of “external” colonialism between countries, as well as “internal” colonialism within states. Many national liberation movements find it useful to frame their case in terms of strategic essentialism, in particular in order to adapt to international law. That is an understandable reaction when old colonial ideology still circulates, as in the “Clash of Civilizations” hypothesis. Political anthropology, however, offers another remedy: an empirical sensitivity to the plural and often paradoxical concrete practices that make and maintain the State, as well as cultural complexity and exchange beyond the imagined community of the Nation. For example, in a study of “The Internet in the Moroccan Public Sphere, the anthropologist Brigt Hope observed entrepreneurs embedded in French and Arab media economy, trying to develop a media sector still hampered after Arab and French colonisation. Recent political anthropology has unsettled the assumed dichotomy between “traditional” and “modern” political systems. They unpack how “state structures are viewed from the inside, by official state bodies, composed of bureaucrats and politicians; and how these state manifestations are supported, reproduced or transformed at a local level." (Knut Nustad and Christian Krohn-Hansen 2006: State Formation. Anthropological Perspectives. Pluto Press.) By objectifying the modern institutions, anthropology unsettles its earlier subject position. In a parallel move, the sociology of development has identified hybrid or multiple modernities, whereas the political science of religion has left the dogmatic belief that modernisation would equal secularisation. Such developments invites to further investigate the complexities of centres and peripheries. From the European perspective, this would imply further inquiry into “internal” colonialism in local provinces, such as Brittany, as well as “external” colonialism in overseas areas, such as Maghreb.
Title Details
Subsidarity, Localism, and the Origins of National Modes of Economic Production View Paper Details
'May God Help her does not help her, we have to do Something'. Negotiating the Protection of Women's Human Rights in Lebanon between Civil Law and Religious Family Law View Paper Details
Anthropology, Landscape and Migration View Paper Details
An Extension of the Official Moroccan Identity in the Constitution of 2011: Appeasing Requirements of the Arab Spring Demonstrations View Paper Details
When a Predator Culture meets a Prey Culture View Paper Details