Subnational Immigration Policies and Politics: Towards a 2.0 Research Agenda
Comparative Politics
Federalism
Migration
Regionalism
Immigration
Abstract
In the past 30 years, subnational authorities and regional entities have become
increasingly involved in immigration politics and policymaking, dealing with a wide range of
issues such as immigrant recruitment, selection, settlement or integration. Despite being this
global movement, considerable differences exist between its embodiments between various
states, both in Europe and in settler states like Canada, the United States and Australia. The
rescaling of immigration politics and policymaking has profoundly changed the landscape of
immigration governance. It has given rise to new intergovernmental processes and
relationships implying different levels of government, resulting in patterns of collaboration or
conflict. Moreover, through this movement, immigration politics itself became visible at the
regional, subnational and local scales. Indeed, phenomena like politicisation, populist
discourses, anti-immigrant parties or social movements also happen with distinctive features
at the subnational level. Consequently, a complete and holistic understanding of the links
between migration politics and governance demands that we take into consideration the
subnational scale.
This paper explores concerns for subnational intervention in politics and governance in
the immigration literature. While immigration scholars recognize the need to go beyond
methodological nationalism, the field is marked by strong heterogeneity in the
conceptualization and measurement of the “subnational”. This paper strives to draw the
contours of the particularities of the subnational level in migration studies by answering the
following question: what is subnational? Is this unit of analysis special and in relation to what?
What are the theoretical and methodological implications of different conceptualization of the
subnational? What can be learned from studying and comparing the subnational level, and with
what do we need to compare the subnational level to?
Empirically, this paper first maps and explores the trends in the literature studying
subnational immigration policies and politics. It proposes a meta-analysis of articles published
between 2004 and 2019 in Migration Studies, Ethnic and Racial Studies, the International
Migration Review, the Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, and the Journal of
International Migration and Integration, which are five leading peer-reviewed journals in the
field of migration research. Through this overtime analysis, the paper is able to document the
variegated interest in studying the subnational level, showing when, where and how the
subnational level is studied, and mapping the differences between different world regions.
Drawing on those findings, the paper then moves to identifying important gaps in this niche
field, and to proposing new avenues for research.