1 | Morton, R.B. & Williams, K. (2010)
Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality: From Nature to the Lab Chapters 2 and 7
Cambridge University Press
Gustafsson, A., Herrmann, A., Huber, F. (Eds.) (2010)
Conjoint Measurement, Methods and Applications Chapter 2
Springer
Auspurg, K. & Hinz, T. (2015)
Factorial Survey Experiments Chapter 3
Series: Quantitative Applications in Social Science
Sage Publications
Knudsen, E., & Johannesson, M. P. (2018)
Beyond the Limits of Survey Experiments: How Conjoint Designs Advance Causal Inference in Political Communication Research
Political Communication, 0(0), 1–13
Hainmueller, J., & Hopkins, D. J. (2015)
The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes toward Immigrants
American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 529–548
|
2 | Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2015)
Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(8), 2395–2400
Horiuchi, Yusaku, Daniel M Smith and Teppei Yamamoto. 2015
Measuring Voters’ Multidimensional Policy Preferences with Conjoint Analysis: Application to Japan’s 2014 Election
Available at SSRN 2627907
Strezhnev, A., Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2013)
Conjoint Survey Design Tool: Software Manual
Leeper, T. J., Hobolt, S. B., & Tilley, J. (2018)
Measuring Subgroup Preferences in Conjoint Experiments
Political Analysis 55
Kaczmirek, L. (2015)
Conducting web surveys: Overview and introduction
In Engel, Uwe, et al., eds. Improving survey methods: Lessons from recent research, Chapter 13
Routledge
Toepoel, V. (2016)
Doing Surveys Online, Chapters 6 and 15
Sage
Callegaro, M., Manfreda, K. L., and Vehovar, V. (2015)
Web survey methodology, Chapters 5, 6 and 7
Sage
|