ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

The State and Governance in Post-Transition Period - sponsored by IPSA

Democracy
Governance
Institutions
Political Parties
FP005
Vladimíra Dvořáková
Prague University of Economics and Business
Mikhail Ilyin
National Research University, Higher School of Economics – HSE
Vladimíra Dvořáková
Prague University of Economics and Business
Open Section

Building: Faculty of Arts, Floor: 3, Room: FA313

Saturday 11:00 - 12:40 CEST (10/09/2016)

Abstract

The great expectations in the beginning of regime change with a goal to form democracy are often followed by deep societal frustration few years later. Both expectations and frustration are probably inevitable part of any radical transformation, unfortunately hopes and individual dreams are never fulfilled. The real evaluation of the transformation process can be done only later, two to three decades of development affirm the quality of institutionalization and consolidation of new regime. Almost thirty years after it is still difficult to evaluate the results of transformation in former communist countries. On the one hand, many countries became members of EU and NATO or they were invited to enter the “club” , that can be interpreted as an international certificate of full-fledged democracy. On the other hand, we are confronted with very weak, captured and fragile/failed states. It seems that state building and democracy building were separated processes, that building of the institutions, principles of accountability and oversight were underestimated. This panel would like to answer several questions connected with such a situation: What is the role of sequencing in political transitions of states. modes of governance and regimes? What is the role of political parties in the formation of clientelistic network, why political parties are in post-transition countries often interpreted as a risk for further democratic development? Can democracy defend itself in post-transition period? And can new typology of militant democracies be useful analytical tool for analysing diverse political regimes, their potential for regime fall or regime regeneration.

Title Details
Carts and Horses, Institutes and Practices. Varieties of Sequencing and Outcomes of Political Transitions View Paper Details
Wrongdoings in Political Parties' Funding as a Risk for Democracy – Lessons from the Czech Republic View Paper Details
The Last Ex-Communist Party Still Undefeated View Paper Details
Can Democracy in the Western Balkans Defend itself in the Post-Transition Period? View Paper Details
Toward the Typology of Militant Democracies View Paper Details